Substratum Whitepaper

Currently has - 0 Likes
Like This Discussion

PDF Revisions:

PDF:

View: PDF Viewer | Thumbnail | PDF Embed


Search Prior Claims Database

search

No Results yet

Current Claims

No Claims yet

Bounty

No Bounty yet

Comments

  • MX10178MX10178 Rep This User!
    a new claim has been added! it is claim # cla1552412007
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • seedbountyhunter19seedbountyhunter19 Rep This User!
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

  • MathildeMMMathildeMM Rep This User!
    a new claim has been added! it is claim # cla1552581174
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • MathildeMMMathildeMM Rep This User!

    Great paper, super clear!

    I would however maybe add a benchmark section and explaining how Substratum differs, as indeed such projects already exist(ed):

    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

  • onderI1sonderI1s Rep This User!
    a new claim has been added! it is claim # cla1553012516
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • damexixdamexix Rep This User!

    Quote - The primary issue with web hosting in its current form is that is incredibly expensive! It can cost upwards thousands of dollars per month, solely to host site files. This does not include any maintenance cost or additional security. It makes it incredibly difficult for small or medium sized businesses to have a strong web presence without incurring significant costs.

    Claim - The cost is not applicable to all range of businesses only few. Few that have scaled complex web applications with larger amount of users. It also does not take into consideration that organisations are also looking for cost cutting measures. Why should a small business use a dedicated server space to host a website, that does not have complex functionalities but serve as information page and not a shared space. Most SMEs I have worked with pay very less amount relatively hosting their website. Therefore no significant cost is incurred.
    Secondly enterprise businesses who have on-premise servers may host their files on those servers, hence not making use of third party services. Those servers also serve other functionalities such as networking, hence the cost segment of web hosting amongst the use of these on-premise servers is minimal.

    Effort should be made to be assertive about the specific business audience (those who incur significant cost) this technology applies to.

    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

  • damexixdamexix Rep This User!

    effort is made to have competitive advantage only on one type of hosting (VPS) and not cloud hosting. The paper speaks more of the disadvantages of VPS and provides solutions to these advantages. For example, the resolutions 3.1,3.2, 3.3 are only applicable to VPS and have been implemented by incumbent cloud hosting companies.

    Quote : Drastically reducing hosting costs through peer-to-peer hosting that is billed per request through micro-transactions. This means that you will only be billed when people go to your site as opposed to per minute or hour like AWS and other cloud hosting platforms.

    Claim: In cloud hosting you only pay for the resources you use, not by the traffic request see - (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/app-service/windows) . Moreover, the resolution does not provide a low cost in all cases. Consider a site that is using ads to draw traffic to the site. Hence, the more traffic drawn to the site, the higher the bill. Cloud hosting provides a better solution in this case.

    Quote: In order to serve millions of sites, databases and applications, the Substratum Network uses advanced compression algorithms, geolocation and machine learning to direct the right combination of Substratum Network nodes to serve content to the intended user based on location. This will ensure the fastest load times with the lowest amount of latency/strain on the Substratum Network, the serving machine and the receiving machine.

    Claim: cloud hosting companies have the capabilities and provide more sophisticated approach to serving millions of sites. For instance, the use of application gateways to route traffic to a specific endpoint, traffic managers to route traffic automatically to other available and closest endpoints.

    Quote: Due to Substratum’s peer-to-peer network, websites will never experience downtime.

    Claim: cloud hosting companies have data centres built around the world, therefore ensuring better uptimes experience

    In summary the paper lack a full qualitative assessment of competitors and therefore the resolutions do not provide a competitive advantage

    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

  • damexixdamexix Rep This User!
    a new claim has been added! it is claim # cla1553851021
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • damexixdamexix Rep This User!
    a new claim has been added! it is claim # cla1554452374
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • damexixdamexix Rep This User!
    a new claim has been added! it is claim # cla1554453923
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • DNXDNX Rep This User!

    Some might be skeptical about Substratum, but apparently not everyone. It is trading 37% higher than last week.

    https://highlightpress.com/2019/04/09/substratum-trading-up-36-9-over-last-week-sub.html

    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

  • JacklmmmerJacklmmmer Rep This User!

    And SUB market cap has doubled in the last month. The coin took a big hit in February but seems to be coming back really strong.

    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

  • THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Rep This User!
    A Judgment in Automatic Claim Number - cla1552581174 has been reached.
    It was decided to release 9% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 16% of the bounty and a median of 9% of the bounty.
    Please see below for the opinion of the jury:Opinion 1 - Claim accepted. The facts are incorrect.
    Opinion 1 - the link to AWS lambda is only a small subset of AWS functionality, more of an exception than the rule
    Opinion 1 - Agree with claim as explained by bounty hunter
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Rep This User!
    A Judgment in Automatic Claim Number - cla1552412007 has been reached.
    It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.
    Please see below for the opinion of the jury:Opinion 1 - At the time the whitepaper was written, there is no reason to believe that they did not intended to hedge as stated. It appears that they changed their hedging strategy after their ICO. Companies are entitled to change strategies as they encounter real-world conditions. There is no credible evidence to support the idea that the whitepaper was intentionally deceptive.
    Opinion 1 - There is definitely a discrepancy in the amount of crypto currency they claim to have. However, the bounty hunter highlighted a quote that doesn't really have to do with the claim. Therefore, no bounty is awarded.
    Opinion 1 - Although it is true that Ripple and Litecoin aren't mentioned, I do not see a correlation to the claim. Therefore, no bounty should be released
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Rep This User!
    A Judgment in Automatic Claim Number - cla1553012516 has been reached.
    It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.
    Please see below for the opinion of the jury:Opinion 1 - of course nothing is 100% secure, the statements are consistent with launching a new technology and do not read as misleading
    Opinion 1 - It says secure based on cryptography. Not enough evidence is given to support bounty hunter claim
    Opinion 1 - So they can deliver secure content but according to the claim, because there is a possibility of hacking, their statement of delivering secure content is not true? This is a claim which should have been worked on more, I do not see a reason as to why the claim can be true.
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Rep This User!
    A Judgment in Automatic Claim Number - cla1553851021 has been reached.
    It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 1% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.
    Please see below for the opinion of the jury:Opinion 1 - This is not a claim, just questions.
    Opinion 1 - all new businesses come with risk, the questions raised are indeed valid points but do not point to dishonesty or malfeasance.
    Opinion 1 - This is a very good question for the discussion, but not a claim
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Rep This User!
    A Judgment in Automatic Claim Number - cla1554452374 has been reached.
    It was decided to release 2% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 14% of the bounty and a median of 2% of the bounty.
    Please see below for the opinion of the jury:Opinion 1 - its a bit of hyperbole that web hosting is so expense for small companies, i agree that a small bounty should be given and clarity be given
    Opinion 1 - This is a good comment, which should be posted on this whitepapers page as a comment so that others could discuss. It is clearly not a claim.
    Opinion 1 - It seems very much as an exaggeration. Most business don't pay large amounts. Hence I agree with claim
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



  • THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Rep This User!
    A Judgment in Automatic Claim Number - cla1554453923 has been reached.
    It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.
    Please see below for the opinion of the jury:Opinion 1 - The claim is a knowledgeable and very well thought out, but it can best be described as an evalution of the quality of Substratum's product. There is no evidence or compelling argument made presented that demonstrates that the whitepaper is deceptive or misleading with intent.
    Opinion 1 - these are valid reasons not to use this service but not misleading parts of a business plan
    Opinion 1 - reading through the claim, I determined that it isn't one. its just a statement
    This comment currently has - '' Likes
    Like This Comment

    Flag This Comment

    Info about this claim



Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Attach a file you can also drag-and-drop into the text area below:
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file