TV Finance via Crypto (No. 177)

0  USD start bounty
USD current bounty
Accredited A+ Magna Cum Laude
posted by seednewsowner1
Loading...

Comments

News Article Summary
TV Finance via Crypto

Accreditation

Congratulations

We are proud to announce that the following document TV Finance via Crypto WP version 177 achieved the ChainBLX opinion based accreditation on 2019-03-05 02:30:57.

This accreditation testifies that it is our professional opinion as well as the opinion of our community that whitepaper TV Finance via Crypto is in compliance with the professional standard brought forward and regulated by chainblx.io.

Document TV Finance via Crypto reached its accreditation with the following statistics.

A ChainBLX accreditation is very difficult to archive and in no way should any statistic be indicative of the quality of the document at hand. Neither should the achievement of accreditation in anyway imply that investors should conduct their own diligence prior to any investment.

Likes of forum members: 0 with a total of number of claims asserted 7 and total of claims dismissed 7.

The discussion forum will remain open for future discussion, the remainder of the bounty will be reimbursed to the owner and no future claims can be filed.

In the name of the community and ChainBLX

We wish TV Finance via Crypto the best of success.

MX10178MX10178 Reputation: 52
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551794001

Quote - It would be advantageous to provide Funding for multiple US TV Productions (at least three) To allow for Cross Collateralization

Claim

This statement requires a lot more explanation. There is no clear plan for how the value of co-mingling of funds across multiple projects will be fairly allocated back to investors.

Flags:

Diversity spreads risk because of cross collateralization An investment model with multiple titles allows for profits of titles in the venture to offset any osses other titles may havewih one title it would be All or nothing by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:19:56

7946d354ca95fff02673214125618587
seedbountyhunter14seedbountyhunter14 Reputation: 51
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551773497

Quote - The producer bears the difference betweenproduction costs and licensing fees, but recoups significantly more money if the show is sold insyndication​.

Claim

No evidence for this is given. It's just assumed we have to trust.

Flags:

Producer covering difference between production costs and licensing fees was part of the introduction and not part of investment model presented by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:23:48

4d17fdaa0146309af947bff2a19bfe64
seedbountyhunter14seedbountyhunter14 Reputation: 51
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551773979

Quote - While US TV Networks provide 65 % of the Production financing for Greenlit TV shows(Green-light, network has approved all crucial elements including but not limited to budget,showrunner, and stars.), they are constantly looking for Financing Partners to Deficit Financethe 35 % Balance. There is a Demand to be filled.

Claim

Just a statement. No prove or link is provided. Netflix does not even allow others to invest.

Flags:

This presentation has nothing to do with Netflix which finances 100 % of its productions Network TV shows are not finances 100 % by License Fee from Network Another source is needed by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:28:29

b3f924e1d09e35ded7d083f6a1426979
seedbountyhunter14seedbountyhunter14 Reputation: 51
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551774625

Quote - The Venture should have a Security Interest​​in the TV show (All rights excluding First Run US TV)

Claim

Definition Security Intrest in. Seems like a guarantee. What is it 100% or just for the investment?

Flags:

Security Interest is a lien on the rights to the TV show Would include all rights except firt run US TV on the Network that licensed the episodes by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:30:59

ccc65e9a7d5ccd48193241bc93fd9324
onderI1sonderI1s Reputation: 54
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551780894

Quote - The producer bears the difference betweenproduction costs and licensing fees, but recoups significantly more money if the show is sold insyndication​.

Claim

There is both good and bad to deficit financing,it gives the producers the opportunity to gain major rewards, but they are also taking more of a risk.For networks, they are minimizing most of their risk, but they risk losing out on most profit.

Flags:

Deficit financing is not a choice given to Producers License Fee covers a percentage of the production budget and financing for balance of the production budget needs to be found by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:35:50

2db0b084d0a44fe6c2d342a709e593b1
onderI1sonderI1s Reputation: 54
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551783665

Quote - Funding of up to 35 % Production Financing per show per seasonThe Venture should have a Security Interest​​in the TV show (All rights excluding First Run US TV)Require Each show to have at least 65 % of its Production Financing from the TV Network

Claim

The venture should have an option to finance any subsequent Season of a Tv show it provides Season One Financing.

Flags:

This is covered in the last point under the Parameters section of the write up by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:38:13

6cd1fee043f60c236ce53e94c5281671
MathildeMMMathildeMM Reputation: 54
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message
Automatic Claim Number - cla1551873097

Quote - FEESThe fund should receive an annual 6 % Fee of the TV Production Budget Amount FinancedThe Venture should share in the Net Profits of the TV show (Estimated at 20 %) after deductionof all Production Costs, Sales Fees, Talent Participations and Residuals

Claim

Saying that "the fund should receive an annual 6 % fee of the TV Production Budget" seems to be incomplete. How long for? Should it be for the duration of the broadcast? What if the profits are not coming? Is it up to the producer to pay the fees?

Also saying that "the Venture should share in the Net Profits of the TV show (Estimated at 20 %)" is misleading. Is it the profit that are estimated at 20% or the share of the venture? In both cases, the estimate needs more background.

Flags:

6 % fee runs until recoupment of the investment and are paid upfront Profits like with any investment are conditional and based on the success of the venture by josephinga on 2019-03-18 11:41:33

55202400cee235925ee57b41472d6087
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #40: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551774625.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - since the phrasing is "should" there is no specific guarantee or claim being made.
  • Opinion #2 - i agree with the flag - Security Interest is a lien on the rights to the TV show Would include all rights except firt run US TV on the Network that licensed the episodes
  • Opinion #3 - i agree with the flag - Security Interest is a lien on the rights to the TV show Would include all rights except firt run US TV on the Network that licensed the episodes

Claim: Definition Security Intrest in. Seems like a guarantee. What is it 100% or just for the investment?

Highlight: The Venture should have a Security Interest​​in the TV show (All rights excluding First Run US TV)

f3d58b36a2bc4a74d02bdf936ac5ea5a
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #41: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551780894.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - this is not a claim that warrants a bounty.
  • Opinion #2 - This is not a claim but rather a comment
  • Opinion #3 - i agree with the flag - Deficit financing is not a choice given to Producers License Fee covers a percentage of the production budget and financing for balance of the production budget needs to be found

Claim: There is both good and bad to deficit financing,it gives the producers the opportunity to gain major rewards, but they are also taking more of a risk.For networks, they are minimizing most of their risk, but they risk losing out on most profit.

Highlight: The producer bears the difference betweenproduction costs and licensing fees, but recoups significantly more money if the show is sold insyndication​.

7e7bed87a1514cd1433b53efa0a2d697
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #42: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551783665.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - i agree with the flag - This is covered in the last point under the Parameters section of the write up
  • Opinion #2 - i agree with the flag - This is covered in the last point under the Parameters section of the write up
  • Opinion #3 - Not a claim but statement

Claim: The venture should have an option to finance any subsequent Season of a Tv show it provides Season One Financing.

Highlight: Funding of up to 35 % Production Financing per show per seasonThe Venture should have a Security Interest​​in the TV show (All rights excluding First Run US TV)Require Each show to have at least 65 % of its Production Financing from the TV Network

379baf43f80c1dc842e9efb92c6bbbc2
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #43: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551773497.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - i agree with the flag - Producer covering difference between production costs and licensing fees was part of the introduction and not part of investment model presented
  • Opinion #2 - No evidence to the contrary is given by the bounty hunter
  • Opinion #3 - I checked the flag and clarification for the claim is given in the first few paragraphs. Therefore no bounty is awarded

Claim: No evidence for this is given. It's just assumed we have to trust.

Highlight: The producer bears the difference betweenproduction costs and licensing fees, but recoups significantly more money if the show is sold insyndication​.

8ea6a9e096b64b1a12e7134008a4d804
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #45: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551773979.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 7% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - these are both subjective statements but not really cause for a bounty.
  • Opinion #2 - i agree with the flag - This presentation has nothing to do with Netflix which finances 100 % of its productions Network TV shows are not finances 100 % by License Fee from Network Another source is needed
  • Opinion #3 - Agree with claim. It is a general statement and should not be in absolute terms.

Claim: Just a statement. No prove or link is provided. Netflix does not even allow others to invest.

Highlight: While US TV Networks provide 65 % of the Production financing for Greenlit TV shows(Green-light, network has approved all crucial elements including but not limited to budget,showrunner, and stars.), they are constantly looking for Financing Partners to Deficit Financethe 35 % Balance. There is a Demand to be filled.

ccc99223435a8e2f649fbeb5feec2cf1
Hans2000Hans2000 Reputation: 0
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message

This is a really novel idea that looks like it would work well in the real world. I think we'll see more and more of this kind of tokenization of media projects. It's pretty much crowdsourcing at the next level.

9398e33025f7bce395a897e82a73b3d8
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #51: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551794001.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - i agree with the flag - Diversity spreads risk because of cross collateralization An investment model with multiple titles allows for profits of titles in the venture to offset any osses other titles may havewih one title it would be All or nothing
  • Opinion #2 - Cross collateralization in this context means that fixed costs would be split among several projects, making the overall operation more efficient. There is no further explanation needed, it is standard practice.
  • Opinion #3 - This is only a opinion of the author. Agreed more details should be given. But it's not claim worthy it should be a comment.

Claim: This statement requires a lot more explanation. There is no clear plan for how the value of co-mingling of funds across multiple projects will be fairly allocated back to investors.

Highlight: It would be advantageous to provide Funding for multiple US TV Productions (at least three) To allow for Cross Collateralization

f45e2c885e722e818ddc17756f0330e6
THE JUDGE!!!!!!THE JUDGE!!!!!! Reputation: 0
Status: Member
Send Message
Opinion #52: An opinion has been issued in Automatic Claim Number - cla1551873097.

It was decided to release 0% of the funds. The jury voted in their opinion to release an average of 0% of the bounty and a median of 0% of the bounty.

Please see below for the opinion of the jury:
  • Opinion #1 - I have to concur with the above claim. The estimate provided in the paper needs a bit more elaboration.
  • Opinion #2 - i agree with the flag - 6 % fee runs until recoupment of the investment and are paid upfront Profits like with any investment are conditional and based on the success of the venture
  • Opinion #3 - i agree with the flag - 6 % fee runs until recoupment of the investment and are paid upfront Profits like with any investment are conditional and based on the success of the venture

Claim: Saying that "the fund should receive an annual 6 % fee of the TV Production Budget" seems to be incomplete. How long for? Should it be for the duration of the broadcast? What if the profits are not coming? Is it up to the producer to pay the fees? Also saying that "the Venture should share in the Net Profits of the TV show (Estimated at 20 %)" is misleading. Is it the profit that are estimated at 20% or the share of the venture? In both cases, the estimate needs more background.

Highlight: FEESThe fund should receive an annual 6 % Fee of the TV Production Budget Amount FinancedThe Venture should share in the Net Profits of the TV show (Estimated at 20 %) after deductionof all Production Costs, Sales Fees, Talent Participations and Residuals

f9fe23e6ee2dbfc48dea7e1a164223d2
Sign In or Register to comment.